AI agents seen reshaping cybersecurity Experts urge for major paradigm shift to active immunity at forum in Beijing By Ma Si | China Daily | Updated: 2026-07-01 00:00 As artificial intelligence agents evolve from assistive tools into autonomous decisionmakers and executors, the traditional logic of cybersecurity defense is being fundamentally rewritten, experts and officials said. Li Bing, vice-chairman of the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce, said the AI industry is at a critical juncture, transitioning from isolated technological breakthroughs to full-scale value creation. He called on private enterprises — as key drivers of technological innovation — to actively participate in the "AI plus" initiative, increase research and development investment, and accelerate the large-scale deployment and commercialization of foundation models and agent technologies, while adhering to security guardrails and ensuring that AI benefits humanity. Li made the comments at the 14th Internet Security Conference, also known as ISC. AI 2026, held in Beijing last week. Ren Xianliang, secretary-general of the World Internet Conference, said: "The development of AI agents must embed values of fairness, inclusiveness and security throughout the R&D and application process, while strengthening international rule-making and multilateral coordination to make AI agents a global public good that safeguards security and benefits all." Zhao Zhiguo, vice-chairman of the Internet Society of China and former chief engineer of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, called for a holistic approach to national security, urging stronger core technology R&D, improved tiered classification management and assessment mechanisms, and the establishment of security standards covering the entire lifecycle from development and deployment, to operations and maintenance. Wu Hequan, an academician from the Chinese Academy of Engineering, said that AI agent-driven attacks now exhibit autonomous decision-making, swarm coordination and continuous evolution. He argued that the security paradigm must shift from passive defense to active