Blockchain Tech vs Other Technologies: What Makes It Different? Blockchain Tech is often compared with databases, cloud platforms, payment systems, and other distributed technologies. It is best understood as a specialized form of distributed database and shared ledger built for multi-party trust, tamper evidence, and synchronized transparency. Unlike most enterprise systems that rely on a central administrator, blockchain enables independent participants to share and verify a common source of truth. This distinction matters for professionals, developers, enterprises, and technology learners. Blockchain is not a universal replacement for existing systems. It is a trust and coordination layer that increasingly works alongside cloud computing, AI, IoT, cybersecurity systems, and traditional databases. What Is Blockchain Tech? The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) describes blockchain as a shared, tamper-evident, and tamper-resistant digital ledger maintained by a community of participants. Records are grouped into blocks, and each block is cryptographically linked to the previous one. This structure makes later alteration detectable. McKinsey describes blockchain as a secure database shared across a network of participants, where updated information is available to all authorized parties. AWS similarly defines it as an advanced database mechanism for transparent information sharing within a business network. These definitions highlight four core features: - Shared ledger: Multiple parties maintain or access the same record of transactions. - Consensus: Network participants follow rules to validate and order transactions. - Cryptographic linking: Blocks are connected using cryptographic methods that make tampering evident. - Multi-party governance: Control is distributed across participants rather than concentrated in one operator. These features make blockchain useful for supply chains, digital identity, records management, digital assets, compliance, and financial settlement. Blockchain Tech vs Traditional Databases Traditional databases, including SQL and NoSQL systems, are optimized for performance, flexible queries, and internal business applications. They work well when one
Jun 2, 2026 · via blockchain-council.org
ONEKEY IoT & OT Cybersecurity Report: Following a Strong Response, the Survey for the 2026 Edition Is Now Open ONEKEY IoT & OT Cybersecurity Report: Following a Strong Response, the Survey for the 2026 Edition Is Now Open Report Review 2025: Two-thirds of companies had not yet adequately prepared for the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), even though the first CRA requirements will take effect in September 2026 Düsseldorf, June 2, 2026 — The Düsseldorf-based cybersecurity company ONEKEY has reported strong demand for its latest "IoT & OT Cybersecurity Report 2025." The report examines how well manufacturers of digital devices, machines, and systems are prepared for the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The CRA is the first EU regulation requiring manufacturers to comply with binding cybersecurity requirements throughout the entire product lifecycle and to systematically manage vulnerabilities. A key finding of the IoT & OT Cybersecurity Report 2025 is that approximately two-thirds of companies are not yet adequately prepared for the CRA — despite the first provisions of the EU regulation for connected products taking effect later this year. It is estimated that hundreds of millions, potentially even billions, of digital products within the EU will be affected. The report is available to download here. "The consistently high demand shows just how urgent this issue has become for affected manufacturers," said Jan Wendenburg, CEO of ONEKEY. ONEKEY Strengthens Cyber Resilience: IoT & OT Cybersecurity Report 2026 and CRA Fast Start To continue monitoring the current state of cybersecurity readiness, ONEKEY has launched a new survey focused on the Cyber Resilience Act. Companies in the target group, namely manufacturers of internet-connected digital products, can request the survey link by emailing info@onekey.com">info@onekey.com with “CRA Survey” in the subject line. Participants will receive early access to the latest findings. In addition, ONEKEY now offers
Jun 2, 2026 · via presseportal.de
As organizations continue their digital transformation journeys, the cybersecurity landscape is evolving at an unprecedented pace. The year 2026 is expected to bring new challenges as cybercriminals adopt more sophisticated techniques, leverage artificial intelligence, and exploit increasingly complex digital ecosystems. Businesses, governments, and individuals must stay informed about emerging threats and implement proactive security measures to reduce their exposure to cyber risks. 1.) AI-Powered Cyberattacks- Artificial intelligence has become a double-edged sword in cybersecurity. While security teams use AI to detect threats and automate defenses, attackers are also using the technology to create more convincing phishing campaigns, automate malware development, and conduct large-scale reconnaissance operations. AI-generated emails, voice impersonations, and deepfake content are making social engineering attacks harder to identify than ever before. To mitigate these risks, organizations should implement advanced email filtering, conduct regular employee awareness training, and adopt multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all critical systems. 2.) Ransomware Evolution- Ransomware remains one of the most significant cybersecurity threats. Attack groups are increasingly targeting cloud environments, backup systems, and third-party vendors to maximize the impact of their attacks. Instead of simply encrypting data, many criminals now combine data theft with extortion tactics, threatening to publish sensitive information if payments are not made. Regular offline backups, network segmentation, vulnerability management, and incident response planning remain essential defenses against ransomware attacks. 3.) Cloud Security Misconfigurations- As businesses continue migrating workloads to cloud platforms, misconfigured storage buckets, exposed databases, and excessive user permissions remain common security weaknesses. A single configuration error can expose vast amounts of sensitive data to the public internet. Organizations should adopt a zero-trust approach, continuously monitor cloud environments, and perform regular security audits to identify and remediate misconfigurations before attackers can exploit them. 4.) Supply Chain Attacks- Cybercriminals increasingly recognize that targeting suppliers, software vendors, and service providers can
Jun 2, 2026 · via cybersecurity-insiders.com
As reported by Security Week, Dragos has acquired Phosphorus, a specialist in extended Internet of Things (xIoT) security, in a strategic move to bolster its capabilities in securing and managing the increasing number of connected devices within critical infrastructure and operational technology (OT) networks.The acquisition aims to integrate Phosphorus' platform, which identifies connected devices, assesses exposures, and automates remediation, into Dragos' offerings. Phosphorus' capabilities include automating security tasks such as password rotation, firmware updates, and certificate management across large device fleets. This integration is expected to provide Dragos customers with enhanced asset visibility and device intelligence, with automated remediation workflows and a unified platform experience to follow.While financial terms were not disclosed, Phosphorus, founded in 2017, had previously raised approximately $65 million in funding. Sonu Shankar will lead the Phosphorus business as General Manager within Dragos during a phased integration. The move signifies a focus on securing the "control loop" and physical aspects of operational technology, rather than solely the operating systems.Security Week
Source: Get daily email updates
SC Media's daily must-read of the most current and pressing daily news
You can skip this ad in 5 seconds
Jun 1, 2026 · via scworld.com
About
Press
Copyright
Contact us
Creators
Advertise
Developers
Terms
Privacy
Policy & Safety
How YouTube works
Test new features
NFL Sunday Ticket
© 2026 Google LLC
Jun 1, 2026 · via youtube.com
China is introducing a new cybersecurity labeling system for foreign makers of internet-connected devices. Ironically, this comes amid accusations by Western governments that China-linked hacking groups have exploited vulnerable routers and smart devices to support cyber operations worldwide. Under the China Cybersecurity Label program, which takes effect on July 1st, foreign manufacturers selling connected products in China can apply for a 1- to 3-star cybersecurity rating. The labels will be displayed on products and linked to detailed security reports through QR codes, allowing buyers to review testing results and compliance information. While participation in the program is voluntary, analysts expect the certification to become an important signal for companies seeking to compete in the Chinese market. Interestingly, just a few weeks back, cybersecurity agencies from 9 countries warned that China-linked threat actors had been hijacking home routers and other internet-connected devices to conceal malicious activity and build covert infrastructure for cyber campaigns. Now, China is positioning itself as a champion of IoT security by requiring foreign manufacturers to demonstrate that their products meet cybersecurity standards. Cybersecurity becomes a selling point The Chinese initiative reflects a broader shift taking place worldwide. Governments increasingly view routers, smart cameras, and other connected appliances not as ordinary consumer gadgets but as potential entry points into critical networks. For years, cybersecurity remained largely invisible to consumers. Buyers compared prices, features, and performance, while security protections stayed hidden in technical documentation. That’s beginning to change. China's labeling system mirrors similar efforts elsewhere, including the US Cyber Trust Mark program, which seeks to help consumers identify connected products that meet minimum security requirements. Still, China’s new labeling framework creates an unusual contrast. Even as Beijing is asking foreign manufacturers to prove the security of their connected products, many Western governments continue to accuse China-linked groups of exploiting
Jun 1, 2026 · via cybernews.com
OECD links AI openness to innovation and economic growth AI openness can help firms, SMEs and public institutions adapt models to local and sector-specific needs. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has published a discussion paper for the G7 on the potential economic and strategic benefits of AI openness. The paper, prepared at the request of France’s 2026 G7 Presidency, is intended to inform discussions in the G7 Digital and Technology Working Group ahead of the G7 Digital and Technology Ministerial Meeting in Paris. AI openness is defined by the OECD as the broad public availability and ease of access to key artefacts and documentation across the AI stack, including model weights and code, datasets, documentation, safety tooling, and compute resources. The paper examines how openness can affect economic outcomes, innovation dynamics, and national or regional AI ecosystems. The OECD says open-weight AI models are becoming increasingly competitive with proprietary alternatives. According to the paper, open models achieve approximately 90% of the performance of closed models at launch, while often being available at significantly lower cost, resulting in a higher quality-to-price ratio. The paper also finds a positive and statistically significant relationship between AI open-source activity and economic growth across the 33 countries analysed. Using GitHub contributions as a proxy for AI openness, the OECD says the evidence suggests the potential economic benefits of open-source AI activity. Beyond economic performance, the OECD says AI openness can support stronger and more resilient national AI ecosystems by expanding access to models, data, and tools. Open approaches can shift value creation towards downstream layers of the AI stack, where start-ups, small and medium-sized enterprises, public institutions, and other actors can adapt systems to local or sector-specific needs. The paper also links AI openness to technological sovereignty and strategic autonomy. It says local
Jun 1, 2026 · via dig.watch
KPMG’s 2026 cybersecurity report names non-human identities as one of eight load-bearing risks for the year, drawn from interviews with more than 20 KPMG cyber leaders and senior executives at Google, Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, the AI-and-network-security vendor, and ServiceNow, the workflow automation platform. The argument the cybersecurity report lands hardest for CISOs: AI agents, service accounts, and machine credentials now outnumber human users inside most enterprises, and the identity-governance practices built for humans do not survive that ratio. The other seven considerations cycle around the same problem of scale, from post-quantum cryptography migration to IT/OT hyperconnectivity. - Non-human identities now outnumber humans in most enterprise environments, demanding lifecycle governance for service accounts, AI agents, and machine credentials. - Autonomous security agents are moving into the security operations center (SOC), compliance workflows, and identity management, shifting workforce skills toward agent oversight. - Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) migration is now an explicit regulatory program in multiple jurisdictions; finance and defense face existential pressure to act. - Supply-chain attack surface keeps expanding into AI and IoT, pushing third-party risk management toward continuous monitoring instead of annual review. - The CISO mandate has broadened to cover physical-cyber convergence, AI safety, and board-level resilience reporting. What the KPMG 2026 cybersecurity report puts on the CISO desk The full report, available as a downloadable PDF on the KPMG site, is organized around eight considerations: preparing the cyber workforce for autonomous security; navigating geopolitics, resilience, and compliance; safeguarding AI systems; managing non-human identities; enabling trusted IT/OT hyperconnectivity; transitioning to post-quantum cryptography; protecting the supply chain through detection and response; and broadening the role and influence of the CISO. KPMG pulls together insights from a global panel that includes its own cyber partners plus named senior executives at Google, Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, and ServiceNow, supplemented by findings
Jun 1, 2026 · via cybersecurity-insiders.com
Dutch authorities have announced the takedown of a botnet that enslaved millions of infected devices, including computers, tablets, smartphones, and IoT devices, to carry out malicious attacks. The bot network, per the Dutch Politie and the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), consisted of at least 17 million infected devices. More than 200 servers located in the Netherlands acted as the platform's backend infrastructure. According to a statement issued by the NCSC, police officials seized a subset of these servers from a hosting provider that provided the infrastructure. The provider is said to have subsequently taken the botnet offline following its use for criminal purposes. Although the name of the botnet was not explicitly mentioned, local news outlet NL Times reported that the service in question was Asocks, a company that offers residential proxies. In April 2024, HUMAN's Satori Threat Intelligence team identified a campaign dubbed PROXYLIB that involved infecting Android devices with proxyware from LumiApps and Asocks. Per details shared on Asocks' website, the platform advertises corporate, residential, and mobile proxies for monthly subscriptions between $5 and $15, with 5-15% discounts for bulk purchases ranging from 10 to 100 proxies. Residential proxies have legitimate uses and privacy benefits, including to access geographically-restricted web resources. However, the ecosystem is also shadowy, with many providers catering to bad actors who purchase access to compromised devices enrolled in these networks to route malicious traffic and carry out cyber attacks. "Devices can become part of a botnet when they are accessible to malicious actors," NCSC said. "After gaining access, attackers can install malware that allows the device to be controlled remotely. This enables the device to become part of a network used for cybercriminal activities." To counter the threat posed by botnet malware, it's advised to keep the operating systems up-to-date, maintain visibility of
May 31, 2026 · via thehackernews.com
For years, post-quantum cryptography (PQC) was treated as a future concern — important, but distant. That mindset is changing rapidly. Governments, standards bodies, and major technology providers are now moving from theoretical discussions to concrete migration timelines. NIST has finalized its first PQC standards. NSA guidance under CNSA 2.0 is reshaping expectations for national security systems. Regulators increasingly expect organizations to understand where cryptography is deployed, how it is managed, and whether it can adapt to future threats. The challenge for most enterprises is not simply selecting new algorithms. It is understanding whether their organization is operationally prepared for cryptographic change at scale. For IT and security professionals, the real question is no longer “Should we prepare for PQC?” It is “How mature is our organization’s ability to manage cryptography as an enterprise capability?” The Hidden Problem: Most Organizations Don’t Truly Know Their Cryptographic Footprint In many enterprises, cryptography evolved organically over decades. Encryption exists across: - Applications - APIs - VPNs - Databases - Cloud workloads - Identity systems - IoT devices - Third-party software - DevOps pipelines - Hardware security modules - Embedded systems But very few organizations maintain a comprehensive inventory of: - Which algorithms are deployed - Where keys are managed - Which systems depend on legacy cryptography - Which vendors support crypto-agility - Which assets are most exposed to quantum-era risks This lack of visibility creates a significant operational risk. When organizations cannot rapidly identify and replace vulnerable cryptographic components, every future cryptographic transition becomes slower, more expensive, and more disruptive. That is precisely why crypto-agility has emerged as one of the defining security capabilities of the next decade. Post-Quantum Migration Is an Organizational Problem — Not Just a Technical One One of the most common misconceptions about PQC is that it is simply a
May 31, 2026 · via cybersecurity-insiders.com
Zug, Switzerland, May 29, 2026 WISeKey International Holding Ltd. ("WISeKey" or the "Company") (SIX: WIHN, NASDAQ: WKEY), a leading global cybersecurity and IoT company, announced today that the Board of Directors has submitted its proposals for shareholder approval at the 2026 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders ("AGM"). Key items that the Board of Directors recommends shareholders to approve include, among other things: - Annual Report 2025 (including audited financial statements) - Discharge of the Board and Executive Management - Re-election of all seven current members of the Board of Directors and election of one new member of the Board of Directors - Re-election of the Nomination & Compensation Committee - Re-election of the Auditor and Independent Proxy - Votes relating to the compensation of the Board of Directors and Executive Management The 2026 AGM will be held at 2:00 p.m. CEST on Monday, June 29, 2026 at the offices of Homburger AG, Prime Tower, Hardstrasse 201, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland. It will be possible for shareholders to attend the AGM in person at the venue. Shareholders may also exercise their voting rights by giving electronic or written voting instructions to the independent voting rights representative, as further described in the Company's invitation to the 2026 AGM published on the date of this press release, or by giving proxy to a representative. About WISeKey WISeKey International Holding Ltd ("WISeKey", SIX: WIHN; Nasdaq: WKEY) is a global leader in cybersecurity, digital identity, and IoT solutions platform. It operates as a Swiss-based holding company through several operational subsidiaries, each dedicated to specific aspects of its technology portfolio. The subsidiaries include (i) SEALSQ Corp (Nasdaq: LAES), which focuses on semiconductors, PKI, and post-quantum technology products, (ii) WISeKey SA, which specializes in RoT and PKI solutions for secure authentication and identification in IoT, blockchain, and AI,
May 29, 2026 · via investingnews.com
The behavioral signals that sharpen Trojan malware detection Malware analysts spend a lot of time deciding which signals from a sandbox run are worth keeping. A sample executed in a controlled environment can generate hundreds of measurable attributes covering file structure, registry edits, process behavior, and network traffic. Most of those attributes add noise. A recent study works through this problem in detail, and the part that earns attention from working defenders is the feature selection, not the deep learning model attached to it. What the study set out to do The team built a detection framework for Windows-based IoT and industrial IoT gateways. They assembled 3,000 Windows executables, ran each one through the ANY.RUN sandbox, and recorded behavioral, static, and network-level data for every sample. The samples were labeled benign, suspicious, or malicious. From the raw output, they pulled an initial pool of 146 features and reduced it to a working set of 33. A custom neural network they call TrDNN then classified the samples, and they compared it against ten common machine learning and deep learning models. The classification results came out strong. For a cybersecurity reader, the more useful material sits in how the 33 features were chosen and what those features say about current Trojan tradecraft. The feature set reads like a Trojan playbook The retained features map to the stages of a Trojan compromise. Persistence shows up through registry autorun keys, scheduled tasks, Windows service installation, and startup-folder edits. Execution and evasion appear through process injection into trusted processes such as explorer.exe and svchost.exe, memory-allocation calls, hidden-window execution, and User Account Control tampering. Command-and-control activity comes through in low-jitter beaconing intervals, HTTP POST and PUT patterns that point to data exfiltration, encrypted outbound bursts, and traffic concentrated on a small number of endpoints. Binary-level signals
May 29, 2026 · via helpnetsecurity.com
Email Article All set! This article has been sent to my@email.address. All fields are required. For multiple recipients, separate email addresses with a semicolon. Please Note: Only individuals with an active subscription will be able to access the full article. All other readers will be directed to the abstract and would need to subscribe. The Analyst Team Shobhit Srivastava Follow AnalystSenior Principal Analyst Shobhit is a seasoned industry analyst with over eight years of experience providing consulting and advisory services covering mobile devices and ecosystems, components, semiconductors, and IoT. At Omdia, he focuses on IoT hardware and platforms, including IoT modules, chipsets, and other components. Shobhit is based out of Toronto, Canada. Shobhit joined Omdia after completing his MBA from IE Business School with a specialization in technology and entrepreneurship. Prior to his MBA, he was a research analyst at Counterpoint Research for almost six years, covering diverse industry sectors. He also worked as a technology consultant at Wipro for a few years. His interests lie in helping businesses understand the emergence and intersection of multiple technologies like AI, IoT, cloud, and next-generation connectivity and how they can be leveraged for future growth. This interest comes from his engineering background, and Shobhit also holds an engineering degree in information technology from Vellore Institute of Technology, India. More Content By Shobhit SrivastavaBecome A Client Find out more about our full suite of products and solutions. Become A ClientYou must sign in to use this functionality Authentication.SignIn.HeadSignInHeader These are Omdia driven recommendations based on content that is both similar, and has been frequently visited by other users in combination with the content you are currently viewing. Omdia Recommends These are Omdia driven recommendations based on content that is both similar, and has been frequently visited by other users in combination with the
May 28, 2026 · via omdia.tech.informa.com
Global IoT Device Management Market Growth Driven by AI, Cloud, and 5G Expansion IoT Device Management Market Expected to Reach $29.5 Billion by 2032 as Connected Devices Surge Worldwide WILMINGTON, DE, UNITED STATES, May 27, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ -- The global IoT device management market is experiencing substantial growth as industries increasingly adopt connected technologies, cloud computing, and advanced automation systems. According to a new report published by Allied Market Research, the IoT device management market was valued at $2.2 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach $29.5 billion by 2032, growing at a remarkable CAGR of 30.2% from 2023 to 2032. The rapid expansion of IoT ecosystems, increasing deployment of 5G network, and rising concerns regarding cybersecurity and data privacy are among the major factors driving the growth of the IoT device management market. Organizations worldwide are increasingly focusing on efficient monitoring, provisioning, maintenance, and security of connected devices to ensure seamless digital operations. Download PDF Brochure: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/request-sample/A13166 Overview of the IoT Device Management Market IoT device management refers to the process of monitoring, configuring, maintaining, and securing connected devices within an Internet of Things ecosystem. It enables organizations to remotely manage devices, track their performance, diagnose technical issues, and deliver software updates efficiently. As the number of connected devices continues to grow across industries, effective device management solutions have become essential for ensuring operational continuity and reducing system downtime. IoT device management platforms help businesses maintain control over complex networks of sensors, smart devices, gateways, and industrial equipment. The IoT device management market is gaining strong momentum due to the increasing need for centralized control, automation, and real-time device monitoring. Businesses are investing in advanced management platforms to improve device efficiency, optimize network performance, and strengthen cybersecurity frameworks. Rapid Growth of Connected Devices Driving Market Expansion The increasing
May 27, 2026 · via tech.einnews.com
The Internet of Things (IoT) is transforming how businesses operate across industries. From smart manufacturing and connected healthcare systems to logistics tracking and real-time monitoring, IoT has become one of the most important technologies driving digital transformation in 2026. But while demand for IoT solutions is growing rapidly, choosing the right IoT development company has become much more challenging. Many companies claim to offer IoT development services, but building scalable IoT ecosystems requires far more than connecting devices. Businesses need partners that understand cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, AI integration, edge computing, real-time analytics, and long-term scalability. Choosing the wrong IoT development company can lead to: Security vulnerabilities Weak scalability Device connectivity issues Expensive maintenance Delayed deployment Poor user experience Infrastructure failures That’s why businesses should carefully evaluate IoT development companies before starting a project. This guide explains the most important factors businesses should consider when choosing an IoT development company in 2026. Understand Your IoT Project Requirements First Before hiring any IoT development company, businesses should clearly define their project goals. Questions to ask include: - What problem will the IoT solution solve? - Which devices need to be connected? - Will the system require real-time monitoring? - Do you need cloud infrastructure? - Will AI or automation be integrated? - How many users or devices will the platform support? - What security requirements are necessary? Having clear project requirements helps businesses choose companies with the right technical expertise. Without proper planning, IoT projects often become expensive and difficult to scale later. Look for Industry-Specific Experience IoT solutions vary significantly across industries. For example: - Healthcare IoT requires strong compliance and data security - Manufacturing IoT focuses heavily on automation and predictive maintenance - Logistics IoT depends on real-time tracking systems - Retail IoT often involves customer analytics and smart inventory
May 26, 2026 · via whatech.com
Chandigarh University Becomes India's First Private University to Launch a Private Internet Technology Research Lab with India Internet Foundation NewsVoir Chandigarh [India], February 24: The rapid advancements in the world of technology in recent decades have not only altered but transformed the dynamics of modern warfare completely. Amid rising cyber warfare threats, growing risks of digital espionage and the increasing weaponization of emerging technologies has indeed made it imperative for India to strengthen its cybersecurity resilience and build next-generation secure communication capabilities that not only ensure the expansion of the country's digital economy but also safeguard the national defence preparedness. And to strengthen India's cybersecurity and secure communication research capabilities, Chandigarh University in collaboration with the India Internet Foundation (IIFON) has established an Internet Technology Research Lab under the AIORI (Advanced Internet Operations Research in India) framework, becoming the first private university in the country and the third institution overall after IIT Guwahati and IISc Bengaluru to set up such a specialized facility. Internet Technology Lab at Chandigarh University to Strengthen Indigenous Cybersecurity Research and Build Next-Gen Secure Internet Systems This initiative is aimed at building a robust indigenous research ecosystem wherein this lab will function as a collaborative platform for research, training and capacity building in internet technologies, internet measurement systems, IoT, DNS infrastructure, quantum-safe DNS and next-generation internet systems with technological inputs, tools, testbeds and research support from the India Internet Foundation. The AIORI collaboration will provide Chandigarh University students and faculty access to a national-scale research testbed spread across multiple locations and hundreds of measurement anchors, enabling advanced experimentation and development in secure and intelligent internet systems. The initiative also supports course delivery through production-grade testbeds for edge computing, distributed systems, IoT and cloud computing, while creating opportunities for internships, live projects and hands-on training for students.
May 26, 2026 · via bignewsnetwork.com
Newsroom Artificial intelligence, connected sensors and big data analytics are reshaping how cities manage drinking water and treat sewage, but a new study finds that critical gaps in sewage infrastructure, cybersecurity and equity threaten to limit the benefits of that transformation. A systematic literature review published in the journal Water mapped how Industry 4.0 technologies are being deployed across urban water and sanitation systems. Researchers at Santa Catarina State University (UDESC) in Brazil analysed 208 peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024, covering applications from water distribution and leak detection to wastewater treatment and consumption measurement. AI and IoT lead the way, but not uniformly Three technologies dominate the evidence base. Artificial intelligence accounted for 43% of all recorded occurrences, followed by big data and data analytics at 26.5% and the internet of things (IoT) at 19.8%. Together, they represent nearly 90% of all identified applications. IoT stood out as the most versatile, being the only technology documented across every application area examined: from water distribution and wastewater treatment to sewage collection and smart metering. In practice, networks of sensors embedded in pipes, pumps and treatment plants provide operators with real-time data on pressure, flow rates and water quality that traditional monitoring methods cannot match. One study cited in the review found that IoT-enabled wastewater monitoring systems achieved efficiency levels approaching 88.7% and recycling rates of up to 96.3%. Another recorded a 95% success rate for IoT-based smart metering in detecting residential leaks. While Industry 4.0 technologies are moving sanitation services from reactive to predictive management, stronger policy support, investment in sewerage infrastructure and sector-specific cybersecurity frameworks are needed Artificial intelligence is being applied to leakage control by detecting anomalies in pressure and flow data, enabling faster localisation of losses and reducing non-revenue water. In wastewater treatment, the second most
May 26, 2026 · via smartwatermagazine.com
Artificial intelligence, connected sensors and big data analytics are reshaping how cities manage drinking water and treat sewage, but a new study finds that critical gaps in sewage infrastructure, cybersecurity and equity threaten to limit the benefits of that transformation. A systematic literature review published in the journal Water mapped how Industry 4.0 technologies are being deployed across urban water and sanitation systems. Researchers at Santa Catarina State University (UDESC) in Brazil analysed 208 peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024, covering applications from water distribution and leak detection to wastewater treatment and consumption measurement. AI and IoT lead the way, but not uniformly Three technologies dominate the evidence base. Artificial intelligence accounted for 43% of all recorded occurrences, followed by big data and data analytics at 26.5% and the internet of things (IoT) at 19.8%. Together, they represent nearly 90% of all identified applications. IoT stood out as the most versatile, being the only technology documented across every application area examined: from water distribution and wastewater treatment to sewage collection and smart metering. In practice, networks of sensors embedded in pipes, pumps and treatment plants provide operators with real-time data on pressure, flow rates and water quality that traditional monitoring methods cannot match. One study cited in the review found that IoT-enabled wastewater monitoring systems achieved efficiency levels approaching 88.7% and recycling rates of up to 96.3%. Another recorded a 95% success rate for IoT-based smart metering in detecting residential leaks. While Industry 4.0 technologies are moving sanitation services from reactive to predictive management, stronger policy support, investment in sewerage infrastructure and sector-specific cybersecurity frameworks are needed Artificial intelligence is being applied to leakage control by detecting anomalies in pressure and flow data, enabling faster localisation of losses and reducing non-revenue water. In wastewater treatment, the second most common
May 26, 2026 · via smartwatermagazine.com
Does your business need a software bill of materials? An SBOM helps firms to regain control of the supply chain At the end of 2021, a now infamous vulnerability was found in the Apache Log4j open-source logging library. It led to a race against time, with teams struggling to identify which apps and services were affected and apply the patch before attackers could exploit the bug. As the risk of similar software supply chain threats multiplies, a software bill of materials (SBOM) can help. Essentially an inventory of open source and third party components, an SBOM is now part of regulations including the US Executive Order on Cybersecurity, the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and the EU Network and Information Systems 2 Directive (NIS2). How do SBOMs work, and does your business need one? Why firms need an SBOM Most modern applications include open source and third party components. As a result, a large share of software risk comes from dependencies that teams did not write themselves. “When a serious issue like Log4j appears, the first question is simple: Where are we exposed?” says Ilkka Turunen, field CTO at Sonatype. “If you cannot answer this question quickly, you have a real problem.” Log4j is “the prime example of why SBOMs can be indispensable”, says Dana Simberkoff, chief risk, privacy and information security officer at AvePoint. “Because the library is very broadly used in consumer and business-facing software applications, the attack on Log4j had catastrophic consequences for a wide range of applications across regions and sectors.” An SBOM might have prevented the worst effects of the attack by allowing IT professionals to more easily expose and patch the vulnerability that triggered it, according to Simberkoff. Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report
May 26, 2026 · via itpro.com
Why resilience is now a core responsibility for connectivity partners As organizations rely more on AI, IoT and cloud-based systems, secure and resilient connectivity becomes essential to prevent lost sales and protect customer trust Periods of high demand, whether driven by seasonal spikes, major events, or unexpected surges in usage, are no longer just a test for end-user organizations. They are also a direct test of the partners and providers responsible for keeping critical systems running. When things go wrong during these high-pressure periods, the impact can be significant. The 2025 cyber attack on Marks & Spencer reportedly affected its H1 2025 performance, while the effects of the Jaguar Land Rover attack rippled across its supply chain. As IT environments become more distributed and interconnected, the responsibility for maintaining uptime, performance, and security increasingly sits with Managed Service Providers (MSPs), network providers, and other channel partners. When outages or cyber incidents occur, customers expect immediate response, rapid recovery, and minimal disruption. From service provider to operational owner Rapid digital transformation is sweeping across businesses, with 94% of private sector IT leaders being familiar with smart spaces. Modern environments rely on a complex mix of cloud platforms, IoT devices, remote endpoints, and real-time applications. These systems are deeply interconnected, with network performance underpinning every business function – so the need for strong, secure connectivity has grown in parallel. MSPs are no longer just providers; they are embedded within customer operations. When something fails, they are expected to respond, coordinate, and resolve issues as part of a broader operational responsibility. Complexity at scale Today’s IT environments are more complex - and more fragile - than ever. During peak trading periods, network traffic can surge unpredictably, cloud services must scale in real time, distributed workforces require secure, reliable access, and connected devices continuously
May 26, 2026 · via itpro.com