No-frills tech news

Uber <b>Autonomous Vehicle</b> Strategy: The $10 Billion Gamble Transforming Transportation

The post Uber Autonomous Vehicle Strategy: The $10 Billion Gamble Transforming Transportation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Uber Autonomous Vehicle StrategyThe post Uber Autonomous Vehicle Strategy: The $10 Billion Gamble Transforming Transportation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Uber Autonomous Vehicle Strategy Uber Autonomous Vehicle Strategy: The $10 Billion Gamble Transforming Transportation Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

Robotaxis Are Ready; New York City Isn't

Robotaxis Are Ready; New York City Isnât The author, who saw the rise of driverless cars firsthand in Fog City, San Francisco, says not so fast, Big Apple. During my last two years of high school in San Francisco, driverless carsâor ârobotaxis,â or autonomous vehicles, call them what you willâwerenât the future. They were a joke. Waymo cars circled blocks aimlessly, teenagers jumped in front of them just to see what would happen, and every now and then one would end up awkwardly nudging onto a sidewalk. It didnât feel revolutionary. It felt like a glitch, an experiment that had escaped the lab too early. No one I knew took them seriously, let alone imagined they would ever function in the real world. Then I left for college in New York City. When I came back to San Francisco for Thanksgiving break, something had shifted. The same cars that once felt like a joke had quietly become normal. I realized this just after midnight, when my 14-year-old sister walked in after me from a party. I asked how she got home, whether a friend dropped her off, or if she took the bus. When she said neither, I warned her about taking Ubers alone that late. âHuh?â she said. âCars donât, like, have drivers anymore.â And then she went to bed. The next day, I decided to try one myself. Using her app, I ordered a ride, half expecting something to go wrong. When the car showed up, it didnât feel broken anymore. It felt deliberate, almost like it had something to prove. I sat in the front seat as the steering wheel turned on its own, casually, confidently. I kept glancing beside me, instinctively expecting a person to be there. There wasnât. The ride was smooth, but unsettling. The

Tesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014): Is <b>autonomous driving</b> execution now the real test?

Tesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014): Is autonomous driving execution now the real test? 19.04.2026 - 21:06:56 | ad-hoc-news.deTesla's shift toward software-driven autonomy could redefine its valuation, but execution risks in a competitive EV landscape leave investors questioning the timeline. For you as a U.S. investor or reader in English-speaking markets worldwide, the core bet is whether Tesla can turn its AI and data advantages into sustainable revenue streams beyond vehicle sales. This report examines the business model, market position, and open questions that matter most right now. Updated: 19.04.2026 By Elena Vasquez, Senior Markets Editor – Tesla's blend of hardware innovation and software scalability sets it apart, but delivery on promises remains key for long-term holders. Tesla's Core Business Model: Vehicles, Energy, and Emerging Autonomy Official source All current information about Tesla, Inc. from the company’s official website. Visit official websiteTesla operates a vertically integrated model centered on electric vehicles, energy storage, and software services, giving you exposure to multiple growth vectors in the clean energy transition. The company designs, manufactures, and sells EVs like the Model 3, Model Y, Cybertruck, and Semi, while expanding into energy products such as Powerwall batteries and Megapack grid-scale storage. This diversification reduces reliance on any single revenue stream, appealing to investors seeking resilience in volatile auto markets. Software layers like Full Self-Driving (FSD) capability and over-the-air updates create high-margin recurring revenue, potentially transforming one-time car sales into lifetime customer value. You benefit from Tesla's direct-to-consumer sales approach, which cuts dealership costs and builds brand loyalty through a premium user experience. As global electrification accelerates, Tesla's scale in battery production and supply chain control positions it to capture market share efficiently. Energy deployment has grown steadily, with Megapack installations supporting utility-scale projects worldwide, including in the U.S. where grid reliability demands are rising. For you,

Wayve: $60 Million Extension From AMD, Arm And Qualcomm Accelerates AI Driver ...

Wayve announced a $60 million investment from AMD, Arm, and Qualcomm Ventures, extending its Series D round and strengthening its position in embodied AI for autonomous driving. The new funding builds on Wayve’s $1.2 billion Series D and brings additional backing from leading technology companies across the automotive compute stack, supporting the company’s efforts to deploy its AI Driver technology globally. Wayve is developing end-to-end embodied AI software that enables point-to-point navigation across different environments and vehicle platforms, spanning advanced driver assistance systems and higher levels of autonomous driving. Unlike traditional systems that rely on high-definition maps or are tied to specific hardware, Wayve’s AI Driver is designed to operate across a wide range of vehicles and compute architectures. The investment is aimed at accelerating integration of the AI Driver across automotive compute platforms, reducing complexity for automakers and fleet operators while speeding time to market. The expanded investor base reflects closer collaboration between software and hardware providers to enable scalable deployment of AI-driven vehicles. Wayve has already established partnerships across the ecosystem, including collaborations with NVIDIA for AI training and vehicle platforms, as well as Qualcomm Technologies to deliver pre-integrated solutions on the Snapdragon Ride platform. The company’s approach focuses on building adaptable AI systems capable of sensing, decision-making, and acting in real time, supporting the transition toward production-scale deployment of autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles. As the automotive industry shifts toward AI-defined vehicles, Wayve is positioning its platform as a flexible, hardware-agnostic solution that can operate across both existing vehicle architectures and next-generation systems. KEY QUOTES “For embodied AI to scale, automakers need design choice and supply chain flexibility. We’re building an AI Driver that works across the full automotive compute ecosystem, from architectures already used in millions of vehicles today to the platforms powering the next generation of

Tesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014): Is <b>autonomous driving</b> execution now the real test?

Tesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014): Is autonomous driving execution now the real test? 19.04.2026 - 04:23:53 | ad-hoc-news.deTesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014) stands at a pivotal moment where its leadership in electric vehicles and autonomous technology could redefine mobility for investors like you. The company's focus on scaling production, advancing AI software, and expanding energy solutions positions it as a high-growth play in a transitioning auto industry. You face the question of whether Tesla's ambitious roadmap delivers consistent returns or introduces volatility tied to execution risks. Updated: 19.04.2026 By Rebecca Langford, Senior Auto Markets Editor – Tesla's blend of hardware innovation and software dominance makes it a unique bet on the future of transportation for U.S. portfolios. Tesla's Core Business Model Tesla operates a vertically integrated model that controls design, manufacturing, software, and sales of electric vehicles, energy storage, and solar products. This approach allows the company to innovate rapidly without traditional supplier dependencies, giving you direct exposure to efficiencies in battery production and over-the-air updates. Unlike legacy automakers reliant on dealer networks, Tesla's direct-to-consumer sales build strong customer data loops for continuous improvement. The model emphasizes high-margin software and services, such as Full Self-Driving (FSD) subscriptions and premium connectivity, which boost recurring revenue. You benefit from this as vehicle sales margins have historically supported aggressive R&D spending on next-generation platforms. Energy generation and storage, including Powerwall and Megapack, diversify beyond autos, tapping into grid-scale demand. Manufacturing hubs like Gigafactory Texas and Shanghai enable global scale, with vertical integration in cells and chips reducing costs over time. For investors in the United States, this structure means Tesla captures value from domestic incentives like the Inflation Reduction Act while expanding internationally. Official source All current information about Tesla, Inc. from the company’s official website. Visit official websiteProducts, Markets, and Industry Drivers Tesla's vehicle

Tesla launches 'Robotaxi' in Houston and Dallas with tiny geofences | Electrek

Tesla announced today that its “Robotaxi” service is now rolling out in Dallas and Houston, marking the company’s first expansion beyond Austin and San Francisco. The company shared maps of the two new service areas, which appear to cover small slices of each city. The Houston geofence covers approximately 25 square miles, according to early user analysis of the maps, while the Dallas zone appears to center around the Highland Park area. For context, Tesla’s Austin geofence has grown to roughly 245 square miles after months of gradual expansion — but that took nearly a year to reach from an initial 20-square-mile footprint. Tesla’s official @robotaxi account on X posted the announcement with two map images showing the service boundaries, but provided no details on fleet size, whether rides will be supervised or unsupervised, or pricing. The post simply read: “Robotaxi now rolling out in Dallas & Houston.” What we know — and what’s missing The announcement is notably thin on specifics. Tesla did not disclose how many vehicles will operate in each city, whether those vehicles will have safety monitors inside (as the vast majority of its Austin fleet still does), or when the geofences might expand. As we reported in March, Tesla’s Austin operation still relies on only a handful of unsupervised vehicles — somewhere between 4 and 12 Model Ys operating without a human safety monitor — out of a total fleet of roughly 80 vehicles, though most of those are not operating at the same time. The remaining cars still carry safety monitors in the driver’s seat, and all vehicles are remotely supervised by Tesla staff. The company’s track record on “Robotaxi” promises provides reason for skepticism. Elon Musk predicted 1 million robotaxis on the road by 2020. He promised 500 vehicles in Austin and over

Tesla launches robotaxis in Houston area, but in a limited area

JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Tesla's <b>Automotive</b> Focus: Core Business Amid New Ventures | 2026 Analysis

General Motors Chevrolet, Cadillac, GMC, Buick According to a report from Yahoo Finance, Tesla continues to generate the vast majority of its business from automotive products, a situation that has persisted for a decade. Despite the company's frequent focus on future technologies, its core financial performance is currently tied to vehicle sales. Data from the last twelve months shows a decline in automotive deliveries compared to the previous year, extending a period of stagnation beyond two years. This drop, coupled with reduced selling prices, led to a decrease in automotive revenue from its prior level to a lower figure in 2025. Innovation in the automotive line has been limited since the introduction of the Model 3 and Model Y. The Cybertruck, intended as a major new product, has seen weak customer interest and is believed to be unprofitable. While management has mentioned developing new vehicles or updates, only niche products like the Cybertruck and Semi have been released to date. The company's energy generation and storage business has expanded, driven by demand for battery storage, though its annual revenue remains a fraction of the automotive segment and operates on thin margins. Development of autonomous vehicle technology continues, but its deployment is currently restricted to a single location. In a characteristic shift, Tesla is now emphasizing newer projects to maintain investor optimism. These include the Optimus humanoid robot and the TerraFab semiconductor manufacturing initiative. The TerraFab project involves a collaboration with several other companies to produce chips in the United States, primarily for artificial intelligence applications. The Optimus robots are planned to utilize these chips, with an ambitious long-term production goal. Interactive table based on the Store Companies dataset for this report. | # | Company | Headquarters | Focus | Scale | Note | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | General Motors

Tesla Launches Unsupervised Robotaxi in Dallas and Houston

Tesla started on Saturday offering unsupervised rides on its Robotaxi service in Dallas and Houston, marking the first expansion of the autonomous ride-hailing programme beyond Austin and the San Francisco Bay Area. The launch comes four days before the company is scheduled to report first-quarter 2026 earnings on April 22. “Robotaxi now rolling out in Dallas & Houston,” Tesla‘s official ‘robotaxi’ account posted on Saturday, alongside two map images showing the service areas. The company did not disclose fleet size, pricing, or whether the vehicles would carry human safety monitors. However, minutes after the announcement, the account wrote in a new post, “All by myself.” CEO Elon Musk commented on the announcement, writing: “Try Tesla Robotaxi in Dallas & Houston!” Delivering on a January Commitment The two launches fulfil part of a seven-city expansion plan Tesla outlined in its Q4 2025 shareholder update deck, published on January 28, 2026 alongside the company’s fourth-quarter earnings. That document committed Tesla to launching Robotaxi in Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Miami, Orlando, Tampa and Las Vegas within the first half of 2026 — a timeline CEO Elon Musk called aggressive on the earnings call that followed. Dallas, Houston, Phoenix and Las Vegas had been named as expansion targets as early as late 2025, with Tampa, Orlando and Miami added in the Q4 2025 deck. The same document classified the Bay Area operation as “Safety Driver” and Austin as “Ramping Unsupervised.” The launch of Dallas and Houston four days before Q1 2026 earnings gives Musk a concrete expansion datapoint to cite during Wednesday’s earnings call and Q&A, when Wall Street is expected to press for specifics on fleet size, supervision status, and the timeline for the remaining five promised cities. Geofenced areas The Houston geofence covers approximately 25 square miles and is centered on the Jersey

Stopping driver shortage: Moia demands billions for <b>autonomous</b> shuttle fleets | heise autos

Stopping driver shortage: Moia demands billions for autonomous shuttle fleets VW subsidiary Moia wants to save public transport with autonomous shuttles and demands state funding. The group is also considering bringing in investors. Public transport in Germany is heading for personnel problems. By 2030, estimates suggest that up to 120,000 bus drivers could be missing. According to industry experts, this demographic change is the real driving force behind the technological transformation towards robo-buses, going beyond mere promises of efficiency. Sascha Meyer, CEO of Volkswagen subsidiary Moia, therefore sees autonomous shuttles not just as a technical gimmick. For him, they are the only way to maintain the mobility level in German cities in the face of dwindling personnel. Meyer outlined a roadmap for market ramp-up in a podcast by Table.Today published on Saturday. However, this requires extensive financial participation from the state. The company strategist proposes the establishment of three model regions, each deploying around 2000 autonomous vehicles. To achieve this goal, he estimates state support of approximately 500 million euros per region. So, it's about a lot of money: According to Meyer, the total development costs for the technology are in the billions. The Federal Ministry of Transport (BMV) has already signaled interest. However, it is tempering expectations of large cash injections and points to the current lack of funds for a project of this magnitude. Videos by heise The call for state support underscores the investment pressure in an industry suffering from high operating costs. In Hamburg, for example, the IG Metall union is currently demanding a 20 percent wage increase for the drivers of the still manually operated shuttles. This cost pressure has already forced Moia to curtail its own offerings. From ride-sharing to technology provider To become profitable, the provider is fundamentally restructuring its business model, according

DDOT Releases Report on <b>Autonomous Vehicle</b> Policy

DDOT Releases Report on Autonomous Vehicle Policy  Today, the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) released a report reviewing how automated vehicles (AV) are regulated across the United States. The report is meant to inform ongoing decision-making on how the District can regulate AVs, but does not make specific policy recommendations. DDOT will be issuing a report this summer on AV deployment legislative and implementation considerations. The DDOT report summarizes current AV technology, existing research, and different AV regulatory policy approaches being used by cities and states. It also includes insights from interviews with industry and safety experts and government agencies to better understand emerging practices and concerns. âAV technology is evolving rapidly and jurisdictions nationwide are figuring out how to prepare for its impacts, including potential displacement of workers and loss of revenue,â said DDOT Director Sharon Kershbaum. âThis report provides a comprehensive overview of the regulatory landscape and will help guide discussions in the District, with safety, transparency, and residentsâ needs at the forefront.â The report highlights several critical factors for the safe rollout of AVs, including coordination across all levels of government, robust safety oversight, transparent data practices, community engagement, and planning for accessibility, workforce, and infrastructure readiness. As interest in AV testing and deployment grows, this report will serve as a resource for the District and support upcoming conversations about potential regulatory frameworks which, in addition to transportation issues, also involve the displacement of workers and income streams. To read the full report, please visit: Research Report on the State of AV Policy Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you

Driverless pods studied for Kelowna's Rail Trail | <b>News</b> | pentictonherald.ca

Driverless pods carrying people along the Rail Trail between downtown Kelowna and the airport. Solar panels on the roofs of 45,000 Kelowna buildings. Wildfire surveillance cameras powered by AI that keep an eye on forests around the city. These are some of the ideas explored through a $2 million, nine-year taxpayer-funded research partnership undertaken between the City of Kelowna and UBC Okanagan. “The alliance aims to advance city priorities through applied research and innovation and is supported by dedicated staff from both organizations,” reads a report on the partnership going Monday to city council. “It operates as a cross-disciplinary platform that fosters collaboration, knowledge exchange, and engagement with external partners to broaden impact,” the report states. Five research projects have been commissioned since 2021, when the partnership was created, and four more will be undertaken in the next four years. One of the study projects is a $305,000 examination of the feasibility of developing an ‘autonomous transit system’ that would run along the Rail Trail corridor from downtown Kelowna out to UBC Okanagan and the airport. Though the report doesn’t actually explain what such a system is, information easily available on the internet says an ATS is a public transportation system that uses driverless vehicles, such as shuttles, buses, or pods, guided by AI, sensors, and cameras, to transport passengers. The systems are electric-powered, and promoters say the little vehicles would be cheaper than buses to operate because drivers aren’t required. Such transit systems are being tested in a few places, such as Minnesota and France. Transdev, a French firm that builds and operates transit systems, says its “I-Crystal electric autonomous shuttle is designed for the shared mobility of the future”. Each vehicle carries less than 20 people and has a maximum speed of 50 km/h. A one-mile long Transdev

Tesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014): Is <b>autonomous driving</b> execution now the real test for investors?

Tesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014): Is autonomous driving execution now the real test for investors? 18.04.2026 - 12:38:35 | ad-hoc-news.deTesla, Inc. stock (US88160R1014) stands at a crossroads where its leadership in electric vehicles meets the high-stakes bet on autonomous technology. You as an investor in the United States or English-speaking markets worldwide need to weigh if Tesla's pivot to software-driven revenue from Full Self-Driving (FSD) and robotaxis can sustain its premium valuation amid intensifying competition. The company's ability to scale these technologies profitably will determine if shares reward patience or expose you to execution risks. Updated: 18.04.2026 By Elena Harper, Senior Markets Editor – Examining how innovation cycles shape long-term stock value for U.S. and global investors. Tesla's Core Business Model: Vehicles to Software Shift Tesla's business model revolves around premium electric vehicles, energy storage, and emerging software services, creating multiple revenue streams that differentiate it from traditional automakers. You benefit from this vertical integration, where Tesla controls battery production, software updates, and direct sales, avoiding dealer markups common in the industry. This approach has built a loyal customer base, with over-the-air updates enhancing vehicle value post-purchase. The real transformation lies in recurring revenue from Full Self-Driving subscriptions and potential robotaxi networks, which could shift Tesla from a car company to a high-margin AI platform. Energy products like Powerwall and Megapack provide stable growth, less tied to auto cycles, appealing to you as a diversified investor. However, scaling manufacturing remains key to funding these ambitions without diluting shareholder value. For U.S. investors, this model matters because Tesla's U.S. factories in Texas and California drive domestic production, qualifying for federal incentives like the Inflation Reduction Act credits. English-speaking markets worldwide see similar appeal through exports and localized energy solutions, but currency fluctuations add a layer of exposure you must monitor. Official source

Tesla tells HW3 owner to 'be patient' after 7 years of waiting for FSD | Electrek

The Dutch Tesla owner who launched a collective claim against Tesla over FSD on HW3 cars called Tesla to ask about the €6,400 he paid for “Full Self-Driving” in 2019. After 7 years of waiting, Tesla’s answer was to “just be patient.” It’s an almost comically tone-deaf response that perfectly encapsulates Tesla’s approach to the HW3 problem — and it’s only going to fuel the growing legal pressure in Europe. What Tesla told an HW3 owner on the phone Mischa Sigtermans, the Dutch Model 3 owner who launched the HW3 collective claim site we reported on earlier this week, called Tesla today and recorded the entire conversation. He posted the details in a thread on X. Sigtermans paid €6,400 for FSD when he bought one of the first Model 3s in the Netherlands in 2019. Last week, the Dutch vehicle authority RDW granted Tesla type approval for FSD Supervised — the first in the EU. But the approved build only runs on Tesla’s newer AI4 computer. HW3 cars like his get nothing. So he called Tesla. His first question: when does FSD come to HW3 cars? Tesla’s answer: “No information about when it comes, or if it comes at all.” Not when. If. Sigtermans then asked what exactly he paid for. Tesla told him he paid for “the full self-drive capability.” As he pointed out, that’s what’s on his 2019 invoice — “capability.” Not “supervised.” Not “lite.” The full capability. When he brought up Musk’s admission that HW3 isn’t enough for unsupervised FSD, Tesla said it had “no information about this.” When he asked about the promised free hardware upgrade, Tesla said there was “no information within Europe.” When he asked how Tesla plans to handle all the Europeans who bought FSD on HW3, Tesla said: “We share whatever information

'Tesla owes me': Furious European Model 3 owners demand Full Self-<b>Driving</b> refund

'Tesla owes me': Furious European Model 3 owners demand Full Self-Driving refund — as Tesla faces $14.5 billion in mounting lawsuits across the globe When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Full Self-Driving was recently legalized in the Netherlands Furious Dutch Model 3 owner feels many are being left behind Thousands of participants have joined a growing petition against Tesla There is mounting pressure on Tesla to compensate buyers after a dutch Model 3 owner took to X to vent his anger at the company for failing to recognize those customers that had already paid for Full Self-Driving (FSD), but can’t use it due to owning older hardware. Mischa Sigtermans, a self-confessed owner of one of the first Model 3 vehicles in the Netherlands, says he paid for Full Self-Driving back in 2019, when Tesla was prepared to take €6,800 (around $7,500) of his money on the promise that highly autonomous driving technology would be available at some point in the near future. “I waited 7 years. SEVEN years!” the angry owner wrote on X, followed by a link to a petition he has started that is attempting to file a collective claim against Tesla. Tesla owes me €6.800.And if you're a HW3 + FSD owner, they owe you too.2019. One of the first Model 3 owners in the Netherlands. Paid for Full Self-Driving.The promise: same hardware, software updates will unlock full autonomy. Just wait.I waited 7 years. SEVEN years!… pic.twitter.com/zpFW8MUdWp — @mischamartijn (April 14, 2026) Back in 2019, when Sigtermans purchased the Model 3, Tesla publicly advertised that “every Tesla is equipped with the hardware needed in the future to make the vehicle fully self-driving in almost all circumstances”. Seven years later and, despite the technology finally being approved

Hesai Unveils Color-Detecting LiDAR Sensor to Boost <b>Autonomous Driving</b> Accuracy

Chinese lidar manufacturer Hesai Technology has introduced a new generation of lidar sensor capable of detecting color, marking a significant advancement in autonomous driving technology. The innovation is designed to improve the accuracy and safety of self-driving systems by enabling vehicles to better interpret their surroundings beyond traditional distance and shape detection. The newly launched sensor, known as the EXT lidar, integrates both spatial and color detection into a single device, making it the first of its kind in the industry. Powered by Hesai’s proprietary Picasso chip, the system allows vehicles to distinguish visual elements such as traffic light colors, which can significantly enhance decision-making in real-world driving scenarios. According to the company, the product is expected to enter mass production later this year, with plans for integration into flagship vehicles by 2027. This development aligns with a broader shift in the automotive industry toward value-driven innovation, where companies are focusing on improving performance and safety rather than just reducing costs. Hesai continues to maintain a strong position in the global lidar market, supplying its technology to major electric vehicle manufacturers such as BYD, Xiaomi, and Li Auto. The company accounted for more than 40% of China’s lidar market in 2025 and collaborates internationally, including supplying lidar systems for platforms used by automakers like Mercedes-Benz. Despite these advancements, lidar adoption remains relatively limited globally, with the technology present in only 3% of vehicles as of 2025. Some automakers, including Tesla, continue to favor camera-based systems over lidar. However, industry experts believe that innovations such as color-detecting sensors could accelerate adoption by addressing key limitations and improving overall system reliability.

'Tokenmaxxing' is making developers less productive than they think

There’s an old saw in management: What you measure matters. And, typically, you get more of whatever you’re measuring. Software engineers have debated productivity metrics for decades, starting with lines of code. But as the new generation of AI coding agents delivers more code than ever, what their managers ought to be measuring is less clear. Enormous token budgets — essentially, the amount of AI processing power a developer is authorized to consume — have become a badge of honor among Silicon Valley developers, but that’s a very weird way to think about productivity. Measuring an input to the process makes little sense when you presumably care more about the output. It might make sense if you’re trying to encourage more AI adoption (or selling tokens), but not if you’re trying to become more efficient. Consider the evidence from a new class of companies operating in the “developer productivity insight” space. They’re finding that developers using tools like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex generate a lot more accepted code than they did before. But they also find that engineers have to return to revise that accepted code far more often than before, undercutting claims of increased productivity. Alex Circei, the CEO and founder of Waydev, is building an intelligence layer to track these dynamics; his firm works with 50 different customers that employ more than 10,000 software engineers. (Circei has contributed to TechCrunch in the past, but this reporter had never met him before.) He says that engineering managers are seeing code acceptance rates of 80% to 90% — meaning the share of AI-generated code that developers approve and keep — but they’re missing the churn that happens when engineers have to revise that code in the following weeks, which drives the real-world acceptance rate down between 10% and 30%

SF is obsessed with Waymo while human drivers are killing people

JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Why is Waymo using Nashville as a test case for robotaxis? | Opinion

Why is Waymo using Nashville as a test case for robotaxis? | Opinion Autonomous technology may one day improve safety. But “may” is not good enough for a city like Nashville. It should come as no surprise that, within days of beginning operations in Nashville, Waymo began experiencing operational problems. We’ve seen this play out before. In cities across the country, autonomous vehicle rollouts have quickly been followed by real-world failures. In San Antonio, a Waymo robotaxi drove the wrong way on a one-way street during morning drop-off at Cambridge Elementary. In Austin, the National Transportation Safety Board is investigating another case of Waymo passing a stopped school bus – even after claims the issue was fixed. And in Los Angeles, a Waymo vehicle drove the wrong way through a drive-thru. Now those same patterns are emerging here in Nashville. Why Nashville and Waymo don't mix I’ve spent my career representing people hurt by preventable crashes, and one lesson stands out: When convenience gets ahead of caution, the public pays the price. Nashville is a uniquely challenging place in which to drive. It’s a fast-growing city with dense downtown traffic, constant construction, heavy rideshare use and unpredictable elements – like pedal taverns weaving alongside buses and delivery vehicles. It requires quick judgment, adaptability and clear communication between drivers. Those are exactly the areas where autonomous vehicles are still struggling. In just the early days of operation, there have already been examples of Waymo vehicles hesitating mid-turn, stopping in intersections and pausing for extended periods when confronted with unusual traffic patterns. There have been awkward turns, navigation missteps and delays that disrupt the normal flow of traffic. These may sound like minor issues. But in a busy, tightly packed urban environment, hesitation and unpredictability create real risks. When one vehicle behaves