No-frills tech news

How to detect fake content in wake of AI venomous snake hoax

A photo of a venomous snake in a Southern California tree shared earlier this week triggered a warning, neighborhood panic and an all-out search. This is far from the first time that artificial intelligence has fooled people, and it likely won't be the last. Detectors like GPTZero or DeepAI use pattern recognition, audio analysis and other tools to test whether content is real or fake. "Check the source that the information is from," said Jennifer Huddleston, a senior fellow in technology policy at the Cato Institute. Are there other sources that are running the same image or reporting the same image?"

Biometrics at the Border Is Moving Fast. Here’s What GovCons Should Watch

DHS last summer invited industry partners to the Progreso International Bridge border crossing in southern Texas to demonstrate facial biometric capability for Customs and Border Protection. Hear from DHS component leaders and industry experts about biometrics, counter-UAS and AI in border security. Prior to deploying to the border, DHS built and developed a replica of the pedestrian exit environment at the MTF. Rule Finalization Kicks Starts Border Biometric Data Effort The December finalization of a DHS rule accelerated efforts to collect biometric data at borders. Pivot to Real-Time Facial Recognition in Motor Vehicles DHS’ doesn’t want biometrics for border crossings limited to pedestrians.

With wrongful arrests, Jacksonville police show how not to use facial recognition

Like other Florida departments, the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office is wired into FACESNXT, a face biometric reference database maintained by Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office and using algorithms from Idemia. It is one of the longest-running facial recognition systems used in American law enforcement. When considering the risks that errors in facial recognition technology might lead to wrongful arrests, the worry is typically that police departments deploying the tech could trigger false matches against police databases. Jacksonville SO has been here before Police departments across the states have extolled the value of facial recognition technology as a crime fighting tool. That’s why probable cause exists, and (once more for posterity) probable cause cannot come from facial recognition alone.

Samsung's advanced face unlock may not be dead after all

October 1, 2026 • 2 min read Samsung may not have given up on bringing better facial recognition to Galaxy phones. Rumor claims Samsung hasn’t given up on advanced facial recognition According to @phonefuturist, Samsung is still testing technology related to Metalenz’s Polar ID. However, Samsung allegedly won’t use the Polar ID name if the technology eventually makes it to Galaxy phones. The tipster claims Samsung is considering names such as Facial Recognition 2.0 and Facial Recognition Pro, although nothing has been finalized. It’s tempting to connect this to the facial recognition project, especially since Metalenz has demoed Polar ID working under an OLED display.

Police to use live facial recognition in Cambridge for first time

City to get live facial recognition for first time Police will deploy live facial recognition (LFR) in Cambridge for the first time. Cambridgeshire Police said LFR will be used in the city on Friday, following deployments in Peterborough earlier this year, which the force said had proved successful. The system scans faces from a live camera feed and compares them in real time with a watchlist of high-risk individuals, including those wanted for criminal offences, with an outstanding warrant or subject to court-imposed requirements. Sgt Luke Charlton said: "Live facial recognition is another valuable tool that helps us protect the public by identifying wanted offenders and those who may pose a risk to our communities." 'Wanted' Officers will review images flagged as a potential match and will decide whether or not to take further action, the force said.

Retina-Inspired Semiconductor Sensor Boosts AI Recognition of Blurry Images from 47% to 97%

The research team focused on this biological principle. In contrast, the technology developed by the research team adopts an "in-sensor image processing" approach, where the sensor detects light while simultaneously performing some image processing. The research team solved this problem using tungsten diselenide (WSe2), an ultra-thin two-dimensional semiconductor material. When noise-containing images were directly input into an AI trained on clean character images, recognition accuracy was only 47.7%. However, when the same images were input after applying the newly developed image processing, accuracy jumped to 97.3%—more than double.

Facial recognition trial in London stations cost ÂŁ320,000 - and led to no arrests

A six-month live facial recognition technology (LFR) trial in London’s railway stations has been found to have led to one false match against a watchlist of suspects - and no arrests. London mayor Sadiq Khan has confirmed the technology will be used on the newly pedestrianised Oxford Street. A report from parliament’s joint committee on human rights, which called on the government to address the threat of artificial intelligence to human rights, said that the rollout of LFR technology was a “particularly clear example of risk”. Bell Ribeiro-Addy PA Wire Labour MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill Bell Ribeiro-Addy said: “Live facial recognition technologies are a serious invasion of our privacy. As these arrests did not result directly from an LFR alert, they are not included within LFR performance data.

British Transport Police spent ÂŁ320,786 testing live facial recognition at London stations and scanned mo

How the trial worked Live facial recognition cameras compare faces passing through a particular location with images on a police watchlist. Concerns about accuracy and proportionality The trial has renewed debate over whether live facial recognition is appropriate for crowded public spaces. A growing use of facial recognition More than half of police forces in England and Wales have now used live facial recognition on public streets, according to an analysis by Liberty Investigates. The Metropolitan police and the mayor’s office announced plans for fixed facial recognition cameras in the West End. A recent report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights described live facial recognition as a particularly clear example of the risks created by AI.

GIST develops retina-inspired camera sensor to sharpen noisy images

By performing part of the image processing directly in the camera sensor, this approach improves recognition accuracy. “In-sensor image processing,” in which the sensor performs part of the image processing as it detects light, reduces the amount of data that must be sent to external processors and thus lowers power consumption and processing latency. Using tungsten diselenide (WSe2), an ultrathin two-dimensional semiconductor, the team developed a transistor device that reproduces this retinal signal suppression function. The team then used simulations to evaluate situations in which images become noisy due to rain, fog, and similar conditions. However, when the developed image processing was first applied to the same noisy images before input, the accuracy rose to 97.3%.

These were the ‘Adams and Eves’ of facial recognition technology

For billions of people, facial recognition technology has become part of daily life, allowing machines to assess our humanity and our physical identities in less than a second. In return for giving up this part of ourselves, we get a product or service or a sense of safety. These “Adams and Eves” of facial recognition were part of a US Department of Defense initiative in the 1990s. “Our whole relationship to technology to me feels very supernatural, feels very in this world of cosmic horror,” he said. Now when he looks back at these early facial recognition portraits, he feels their vulnerability more than anything else.

These were the ‘Adams and Eves’ of facial recognition technology

For billions of people, facial recognition technology has become part of daily life, allowing machines to assess our humanity and our physical identities in less than a second. In return for giving up this part of ourselves, we get a product or service or a sense of safety. These “Adams and Eves” of facial recognition were part of a US Department of Defense initiative in the 1990s. “Our whole relationship to technology to me feels very supernatural, feels very in this world of cosmic horror,” he said. Now when he looks back at these early facial recognition portraits, he feels their vulnerability more than anything else.

University of Kentucky Installs Facial Recognition Tech Around Campus, Sparking Privacy Debate

That’s the pitch for the University of Kentucky’s voluntary pilot of Alcatraz AI‘s Rock system. During enrollment, Rock captures a temporary facial image and converts it into an encrypted mathematical representation that Alcatraz AI calls a Facial Signature. The template is tied to a badge number rather than your name, according to Alcatraz AI’s privacy materials. Alcatraz AI’s privacy policy defers the template retention period to the “solution owner,” which is the university. The reviewed UK materials do not state a specific retention period or deletion deadline.

Label-free microfluidic chip and AI identify blood-borne tumor cells

Finding a few tumor cells hidden among billions of blood cells is one of the biggest challenges in liquid biopsy. A chip that separates tumor cells by size Most current approaches for isolating CTCs rely on molecular markers found on tumor-cell surfaces. The chip uses these differences to guide tumor cells and blood cells into separate flow paths, allowing tumor cells to be collected without relying on specific surface markers. In artificial blood samples containing MCF-7 breast cancer cells and white blood cells, tumor cells were enriched at the central outlet, while most blood cells were directed toward the side outlets. AI helps identify tumor cells without fluorescent staining Separating tumor cells is only half of the challenge.

Vendor pitches facial recognition layer for Flock camera data

Flock has repeatedly said its automatic license plate reader (ALPR) systems do not perform facial recognition. Its Trust Center says Flock cameras do not use facial recognition and that searches are based on vehicle characteristics rather than identity. A separate Flock data privacy page lists biometric and facial recognition data among information its ALPR systems do not collect. Facial recognition would occur in its system after it obtained data from Flock, rather than inside Flock’s cameras or through Flock’s own ALPR recognition process. The proposal comes as automatic license plate readers and facial recognition draw new scrutiny on Capitol Hill.

Noblis patents continuous biometric verification for secure access

Nonprofit science and technology organization Noblis has been awarded a U.S. patent for an electronic access control system that continuously verifies both user identity and environmental conditions using biometric sensing, environmental monitoring and machine learning. Noblis says the resulting dynamic liveness score can help detect spoofing attempts, including photographs and deepfakes, while continuously checking whether an authorized user remains present in a secure environment. “Traditional authentication happens once, at login,” says Erica Maciejewski, the Noblis scientist who invented the system. The combination of biometric signals with environmental sensors gives a machine-learning model more data to analyze. Mile Corrigan, Noblis’ CEO, says, “We know our customers operate in environments where a single login isn’t enough assurance.

“One searchable platform:” this AI surveillance company wants facial recognition added to Flock

Key takeaways: VIDIZMO proposed linking Flock data with facial recognition to help police search by face, vehicle, or object. Flock Security says it does not use facial recognition and has no plans to add it. However, this doesn’t stop other companies from suggesting services that could combine Flock data with facial recognition technology. No response to the proposal The Johnson City PD told 404 Media that it didn’t respond to the proposal. Because of this, Flock should already include facial recognition capability with privacy, security, and freedom in mind, he suggested.

Surveillance Firm Pitches Facial Recognition Add-On for Flock Cameras

A sales email obtained through a public-records request by DeFlock Johnson City and reported by 404 Media exposes a specific gap. The Sales Pitch That Revealed the Gap A May email to a Tennessee deputy police chief shows how third-party vendors can market capabilities that the original platform declines to offer. VIDIZMO CEO Nadeem Khan confirmed to 404 Media that the specific Flock-to-VIDIZMO export tool described in the company’s marketing has not been built. Khan described this to 404 Media as an agency-controlled import, characterizing VIDIZMO as a downstream processor rather than a Flock partner. Privacy expert Chris Gilliard, quoted by 404 Media, called the promotion of race, age, and gender filtering “appalling.”

Surveillance Company Tells Cops It Wants to Add Facial Recognition to Flock Cameras

As Flock continues to be the center of a nationwide conversation about automatic license plate reading cameras, the company has said that it doesn’t, and won’t, do facial recognition: “We will not add facial recognition to our devices,” Flock CEO Garrett Langley said in a recent video. But other, third-party companies are telling cops that they are willing to add facial recognition to data gathered by Flock cameras in order to “close that gap.” VIDIZMO is a several decades-old video analysis and database company that has started offering facial recognition technology to cops within the last six months. But that Flock data does not connect automatically to your Axon evidence system,” the salesperson wrote. The fact that a third-party company is advertising that it wants to do facial recognition on Flock data highlights a common trend in the surveillance space.

Better strawberry harvest forecasts with image recognition

Without an accurate harvest forecast, it is difficult for them to provide a precise answer. Fruit Forecast helps growers obtain an accurate harvest forecast. Š Fruit Forecast How Fruit Forecast works Growers using Fruit Forecast start by selecting a representative sample in the field. Together with other information, such as weather forecasts, variety data, and fruit weight, Fruit Forecast instantly generates a harvest forecast for the next four weeks. Š Fruit Forecast Accurate and user-friendly Fruit Forecast has set itself the goal of producing harvest forecasts that are as accurate as possible.