No-frills tech news

Automakers Want Congress to Ban Chinese-Made <b>Cars</b>, Citing Data Privacy

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a lobby group for the auto industry, wants an outright ban on Chinese-made cars, parts and software. John Bozzella, the AAI’s CEO and president, sent a letter to congressional leaders this week that asks Congress to ban selling, importing and manufacturing Chinese-made cars, hardware and software. There is currently bipartisan support in Washington to do just that, including the “Connected Vehicle Security Act of 2026,” which “prohibits the importation, manufacture, sale, resale, or introduction into US interstate commerce of connected vehicles and related software and hardware components associated with China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea.” In the letter, Bozzella said the Chinese government’s policies are “rooted in a well-documented pattern of unfair trade, subsidies, intellectual property theft and surveillance.” The AAI expressed urgency and asked Congress to enact a ban before ending its session for this year. The AAI didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Existing automakers selling to US consumers have had their own brushes with regulators over drivers’ privacy. In 2025, the Federal Trade Commission ordered General Motors not to sell driver data for five years, and a Consumer Reports investigation that year found nearly every automaker collects and shares data on driver behavior. Chinese cars, particularly electric vehicles, have seen their popularity rise across the world due to their affordability. One reason those prices are so low is that the automakers get significant government subsidies. Chinese automakers are essentially blocked from selling to US consumers by high tariffs. The AAI said a permanent ban will “send a clear and bipartisan message that China’s strategy to dominate global automotive manufacturing will be met with a national security policy response from the American government.”

American Automakers Have Asked Congress To Ban Chinese-Made <b>Cars</b>

I know people lament that letter writing is dead, but I’m happy to say I don’t think that’s true. I say this because just yesterday the Alliance for Automotive Innovation – a trade group made up of a large number of automakers, including GM, Ford, Ferrari, BMW, Honda, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Mazda, McLaren, Toyota, Subaru, hell, even VinFast, among many others – sent a heartfelt, personal letter to congressional leaders asking about enacting a “permanent ban” on Chinese-made “connected” cars in America. Their argument in the letter is essentially that they believe Chinese carmakers don’t play fair, and are determined to surveil Americans and, when able, steal intellectual property. Here’s what they say in the letter: “Alliance for Automotive Innovation urges Congress to enact a permanent ban on the sale, import and manufacture of Chinese connected vehicles, hardware and software before the conclusion of the 119th Congress. Multiple committees in the House and Senate have devoted time and attention this session to the Chinese government’s industrial and manufacturing policy that’s rooted in a well-documented pattern of unfair trade, subsidies, intellectual property theft and surveillance. This behavior is a feature of the Chinese approach and especially acute when it comes to China’s strategy to dominate global automotive manufacturing and critical supply chains. Right now, Chinese automakers are dumping subsidized vehicles with connected software and hardware around the world. China is capturing market share in Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia, Mexico and South America with vehicles capable of collecting, processing and transmitting sensitive vehicle and consumer data to the Chinese Communist Party. This hasn’t happened inside the U.S. yet, but given the scale and urgency of this threat, we urge you to enact a Chinese vehicle, software and hardware ban before adjourning this year and make this policy the law of the land.” Now,

Bill would force federal audit of automakers' ties to China

On the Dash: - Bill would order a Commerce study of automakers’ ties to foreign adversaries - Review covers ownership, joint ventures, technology transfers and intellectual property impact - Commerce must report to two congressional committees within two years of enactment Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-Tenn.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) introduced bipartisan legislation that would require automakers with financial or technical ties to China to undergo a formal federal accounting of those relationships. The Automotive National and Economic Security Act of 2026 would direct the Secretary of Commerce to study the national and economic security risks posed by foreign adversaries to the U.S. automotive industry. However, the bill stops short of restricting any vehicle or manufacturer and instead builds the factual record lawmakers would need before taking that step. “China has a playbook, and we’ve watched them run it on critical minerals, shipbuilding, and batteries,” Harshbarger said in a statement released by her office. “Now they’re setting their sights on the global automotive market, building out their industrial base with state subsidies and flooding markets with artificially cheap products to undercut American manufacturers.” What Commerce would examine The study would examine four areas: - Foreign ownership of and state-directed investment in U.S. automakers by foreign military organizations, political parties and state-owned enterprises - Joint ventures, subsidiaries and commercial partnerships between U.S. manufacturers and foreign adversaries - Transfers of critical and emerging technologies to foreign adversaries - Impacts on U.S. national security, economic competitiveness and intellectual property protection The Bill Text filed on Aug. 26 broadly defines the activity under review. Any direct or indirect ownership interest in a manufacturer counts, as do any contract manufacturing agreement, research and development partnership, or licensing deal. Connected vehicle technology falls inside the scope The measure also reaches software-enabled hardware installed in vehicles, electronic

US carmakers want a China ban. Waymo imported 3,200 Zeekrs

US carmakers want Chinese cars banned. Waymo has imported 3,200 Zeekrs The Chinese car doing the most miles in America turns up with no electronics in it The Alliance for Automotive Innovation wrote to Congress this week asking for a permanent ban on Chinese connected vehicles, along with the software and hardware inside them. Three days earlier, Waymo opened public driverless service in Denver and San Diego, and in both cities the only car a passenger can ride in is built by Zeekr in Ningbo. None of that is illegal, and the reason why is the whole story. The Alliance wants a law on the books before Congress adjourns on 3 January Reuters first reported the letter on 3 September. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation speaks for most of the industry selling cars in the United States, counting General Motors, Ford, Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, BMW, Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz and Volvo among its members, and its chief executive John Bozzella asked lawmakers to act before the session ends. He argued that Chinese makers are dumping subsidised vehicles with connected software and hardware around the world, and pointed at two bills sitting in committee: H.R. 10158, the Automotive National and Economic Security Act, and the Connected Vehicle Security Act. Tariffs and Commerce Department rules already keep Chinese cars out. The industry wants that turned into law a future administration cannot quietly unwind, even though Ford's own chief executive has told staff the barrier will not hold forever. Waymo's Ojai is built in Ningbo and only becomes a connected car in Mesa, Arizona The vehicle, internally the Zeekr CM1e and previously known as the RT, leaves China as what US customs treats as an incomplete rolling glider. It ships without the autonomous computer, without the sensors and without the telematics. Waymo and Magna

CHI Bears vs <b>CAR</b> Panthers: 4th Quarter Winner Prediction Market

CHI Bears vs CAR Panthers: 4th Quarter Winner Tie 4th Quarter11¢ CAR0¢ CHI0¢ LIVE 1D 1W MAX Select a contract Tie 4th Quarter 11¢ Carolina 0¢ Chicago 0¢ Timeline Trading hours 24 hours a day, except Thursday 3AM-5AM ET Event day September 13, 2026 Contract resolves Determines the outcome of the contract Payout Usually within 1 hour of event resolution About Who will be the CHI Bears vs CAR Panthers: 4th Quarter Winner?The following market refers to the team that scores the most points during the 4th Quarter (excluding overtime). Only points scored during the 4th Quarter (excluding overtime) of play count towards this market. If both teams score the same amount of points during the quarter, all team strikes resolve to No and the Tie strike resolves to Yes.Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.Get $1 for every contract you own if your prediction is correct. Or close your position before the event resolves. Additional fees apply. Read the full contract terms and conditions Trading prohibitions - Current and former players, coaches, and staff of the league, association, or organization(s) governing the event. For college leagues/associations specifically, or where otherwise appropriate (as identified by the Exchange), this applies to current and former players/coaches/staff of the specific teams in CHI Bears vs CAR Panthers: 4th Quarter Winner rather than the league/association as a whole (e.g., if the Division I Gonzaga Men’s Basketball Team is playing in CHI Bears vs CAR Panthers: 4th Quarter Winner, this prohibition will restrict trades by current/former players of that team, rather than all current/former players/coaches/staff in any NCAA sport). - Paid employees of the league and league participants - Owners of

These Are China's Best-Selling $10,000 <b>Cars</b>

The chances of our ever seeing a full range of Chinese cars on American roads keeps getting more and more remote, like the disappearing wall-to-wall taillights on a 1966 T-Bird. On September 3, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, representing automakers, called on Congress to “enact a permanent ban on the sale, import and manufacture of Chinese connected vehicles, hardware and software before the conclusion of the 119th Congress.” It’s important, though, to know what we’re missing. Chinese consumers enjoy some very inexpensive, technically interesting cars that would probably sell quite well if they were ever offered here, even with some tariffs and transportation costs thrown in. Here are five of the more interesting best-selling bargains on the Chinese domestic market. Thanks to the China EV Data Tracker for 2026 year-to-date sales figures, and to Tu Le of Sino Auto Insights for editorial help: Geely Xingyuan Price: $9,130 Higher trims of this EV, a.k.a. Star Wish or EX2, go to $13,500. This number-one bestseller from Geely has moved 226,465 units in China so far this year. In 2025, Geely sold 465,775 of them, surpassing the Tesla Model Y (425,000). The front-drive subcompact is about the same size as a Chevrolet Sonic, with room for five passengers. It offers 46.6 cubic feet of interior cargo space, with the rear seats folded down. There’s also a 2.5-cubic-foot frunk. Range is 193 to 298 miles depending on the version. Don’t expect a ball of fire. The Xingyuan has a 40-kilowatt-hour battery and a 114-horsepower motor, yielding a leisurely 11.5-second zero to 60 time. Just like Doctor Doolittle, it gets you there eventually. Testers say this entry-level Geely has light steering without much feel, soft suspension, and a fair amount of body lean. Says Kevin Williams at Inside EVs, “The EX2 feels smooth riding, quiet,

Toyota Embeds Telematics in ProBox: Japan Delivery Van Gets T-<b>Connect</b> Standard

Toyota released an updated version of the ProBox on September 4, 2026, making a built-in cellular Data Communication Module (DCM) standard equipment across every trim — the first time Japan's most enduring commercial van has carried factory-embedded telematics hardware. The change unlocks Toyota's T-Connect connected-car platform on a vehicle that has historically required dealer visits for software maintenance and offered no remote diagnostics capability, and it arrives with five years of T-Connect access included at no additional cost from the date of first registration, as confirmed by the ProBox DCM T-Connect update reported by Japanese automotive outlets. The ProBox is not a vehicle most TechTimes readers will have driven. It is a five-door, 4,245 mm (167.1-inch) light commercial wagon sold only in Japan, with ProBox pricing and trim lineup starting from ¥1,918,400 (approximately $12,100 USD) to ¥2,261,600 (approximately $14,200 USD). Its design philosophy — maximum cargo floor, minimum gadgetry, mechanics every shop in the country can service — has kept it essentially unchanged since 2014. Annual sales run at roughly 50,000 units in Japan, making it one of the country's highest-volume commercial vehicles and the preferred workhorse of delivery operators, tradespeople, and small businesses from Hokkaido to Okinawa. Today's connectivity upgrade is significant not because the ProBox is exciting but because of what its sheer volume means when connected: approximately 50,000 new vehicles per year now feeding real-time diagnostic and location data into Toyota's Mobility Services Platform (MSPF) through a direct connection to the CAN bus. What the DCM Does That Aftermarket Telematics Cannot The DCM is not a smartphone dock or a Bluetooth adapter. It is a dedicated cellular modem, hardwired to the vehicle's Controller Area Network (CAN bus) — the internal backbone through which all of the ProBox's electronic control units (ECUs) communicate, per Toyota's CAN bus connectivity

<b>Connected</b>-<b>car</b> data raises new privacy concerns for dealers and consumers

As vehicles become more connected, consumers gain new features that can make driving more exciting, but they also share more personal information with automakers. During today’s CBT Live segment, Lauren Fix, Founder of Car Coach Reports, shared insights on how this issue is growing in importance for dealers, especially since many consumers blame dealerships for data practices that are actually managed by automakers and their software. Fix recounted that her concerns about connected vehicles grew after a personal software update on her Ford Bronco Raptor seemed to restore data-sharing permissions she had disabled. The vehicle briefly indicated that permissions were enabled, prompting her to review and revert the settings. She then emphasized the issue’s broader scope beyond Ford, noting that it is tied to automakers’ software and connected-vehicle systems rather than dealer-controlled. For dealers, it’s crucial to understand these systems, as customers might still direct privacy complaints to the retailer. The issue also poses a potential customer-communication challenge regarding connected services, Bluetooth, and vehicle software. Fix said that while consumers may believe they have opted out of data collection, information can still be transmitted when they connect smartphones or use other vehicle-connected features. She argued that consumers need clearer disclosures and a reliable way to opt out. Fix also noted growing consumer interest in simpler vehicles with less technology, suggesting that automakers’ push toward greater connectivity could eventually face resistance from buyers who prioritize privacy and simplicity. Nevertheless, Fix said data ownership could become an increasingly important issue for automakers, dealers, and consumers. She argued that consumers should have greater control over vehicle-generated data and suggested that dealerships could use transparent data practices to differentiate themselves when communicating with customers. She also said AI could help consumers navigate lengthy privacy agreements by identifying data-sharing provisions and explaining how to opt

Hyundai opens orders for its new electric van, starting at about $66500

Hyundai’s electric van is bigger than the Kia PV5 and Volkswagen ID. Buzz, with enough room for nine passengers. Hyundai Staria Electric van prices and specs We got our first look at the Staria Electric in January when Hyundai unveiled it at the Brussels Motor Show. The electric van is essentially the EV version of the gas-powered model sold in Europe, South Korea, and other global markets. After launching it in Korea earlier this year, Hyundai is opening orders for the Staria Electric across Europe. In Germany, Hyundai’s electric van starts at €57,450, or about $66,500. Measuring 5,253 mm (206.8″) in length, 1,997 mm (78.6″) in width, and 1,990 mm (78.3″) in height, with a 3,273 mm (128.8″ wheelbase, the Staria Electric is about 200 mm (7.8″) longer than Hyundai’s three-row IONIQ 9. Although it looks about the same as the gas version, the Staria Electric stands out with EV-like elements, including a closed-off grille and a full-length light bar across the front. The flat floor and open-plan design open up interior space with 7- and 9-seat configurations. The 9-seater offers up to 1,303 liters of luggage capacity, plus an additional 24-liter frunk. With sliding doors and folding seats, Hyundai said the electric van is perfect for larger families or trips with friends. Inside, the Staria Electric adopts Hyundai’s new “Inside-Out” design theme. The setup includes Hyundai’s latest connected car Navigation Cockpit (ccNC) with dual 12.3″ instrument cluster and infotainment screens with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Powered by an 84 kWh battery and a 160 kW (218 hp) front-mounted electric motor, Hyundai’s electric van has a WLTP range of up to 430 km (267 miles). Thanks to its 800V electrical architecture, the Staria EV’s battery can charge from 10% to 80% in about 20 minutes at a 350

Zeekr robotaxis hit American streets as Waymo footprint reaches 14 cities

Zeekr robotaxis expand to 14 American cities as a part of Waymo fleet Waymo began public driverless ride-hailing services in Denver, San Diego, and Tampa on September 1, expanding its U.S. operating footprint to 14 cities. Denver and San Diego launched with the Zeekr-built Ojai as the exclusive vehicle platform, giving Waymo’s newest robotaxi a larger role as the company transitions away from its Jaguar I-Pace fleet. The Waymo Ojai, internally identified as the Zeekr CM1e and previously associated with the Zeekr RT designation, is manufactured in Ningbo, China, before being shipped to the United States for autonomous-system integration in Mesa, Arizona. Zeekr supplies the vehicle platform, while Waymo supplies the autonomous driving system, computing hardware, and sensors. Magna is involved in downstream integration. Denver puts the Ojai into a new environment Denver adds a cold-weather, high-altitude environment to the Ojai’s commercial deployment. The vehicle uses Geely’s SEA-M architecture with redundant steer-by-wire and brake-by-wire systems. Its single rear permanent-magnet synchronous motor produces 200 kW (268 hp) and 342 N·m (252 lb-ft) of torque, paired with a 93 kWh gross-capacity battery. Waymo’s sixth-generation system uses four LiDAR units, six radar sensors, and 13 external cameras, compared with 29 cameras and five LiDARs on the fifth-generation Jaguar I-Pace. The Ojai’s cameras use 17-megapixel imagers. Heated sensor housings and 10 miniature wipers, each less than 3 inches (76 mm) long, are designed to keep sensor surfaces clear of snow, slush and ice. The Ojai measures 4,640 mm long with a 3,000 mm wheelbase and uses opposing sliding doors around a B-pillarless passenger opening. Its 2+3 cabin leaves four usable passenger positions because the driver’s seat is unavailable to riders. The battery uses active liquid cooling. More than 3,200 Ojai chassis have entered the US More than 3,200 CM1e chassis had landed through the

US Automakers Demanding A China <b>Car</b> Ban Include Two With Chinese Owners | Carscoops

- US Congress wants existing barriers to Chinese auto brands toughened and made permanent. - Tech firm-turned-automaker Xiaomi plans European sales to start in 2027. - Canada already allows Chinese cars, can accept another 33,397 under latest quota period. Chinese automakers haven’t cracked the US yet, and the companies already selling cars there would like to keep it that way. A group representing most major automakers wants Congress to turn today’s regulatory barriers into a permanent ban before lawmakers finish their current session. Related: Canada Opens The Door To 33,397 More Chinese Vehicles The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents the vast majority of companies selling vehicles in the States and counts GM, Ford, Toyota, BMW, Hyundai, Honda, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Kia, and Volvo among its members, has written to congressional leaders asking them to ban Chinese connected vehicles along with the hardware and software that goes with them. The group wants legislation passed before the current Congress wraps up on January 3. Tariffs Aren’t Enough Chinese cars are already effectively locked out by hefty tariffs as well as restrictions targeting connected-vehicle technology linked to China, which are forcing Polestar to pull out of the US. But automakers are worried those defenses could change, so they’d rather Congress put something more permanent on the books. “Right now, Chinese automakers are dumping subsidized vehicles with connected software and hardware around the world,” Alliance CEO John Bozzella wrote in the letter to Congress. He urged lawmakers to act before adjourning, citing what the group sees as both economic and national security risks. “China is capturing market share in Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia, Mexico and South America with vehicles capable of collecting, processing and transmitting sensitive vehicle and consumer data to the Chinese Communist Party,” Bozzella added. But one proposal that advanced through a

Morning Business Report: U.S. automakers push Congress for permanent ban on Chinese ...

Morning Business Report: U.S. automakers push Congress for permanent ban on Chinese connected vehicles Major U.S. automakers are urging Congress to permanently ban the domestic sale, import and manufacturing of Chinese connected vehicles, hardware and software. (LILAMAX)- Major U.S. automakers are urging Congress to permanently ban the domestic sale, import and manufacturing of Chinese connected vehicles, hardware and software. Automakers have raised concerns that Chinese competitors, including BYD and Geely, are expanding rapidly in global markets, undercutting vehicle prices and potentially threatening U.S. auto production. Chinese connected vehicles are currently restricted in the United States amid concerns from lawmakers that their technology could be used for spying or collecting sensitive data. Meanwhile, federal safety officials have announced recalls involving children’s toys containing water beads because of the risk of serious injury. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission says the affected products include Squeezy Dumplings from Gihnjsi and Rainbow Mystery Squishy Buns from OKK Trading. Water beads can expand after being swallowed, potentially causing choking, intestinal blockages and other serious health complications. On Wall Street, stocks posted significant gains Thursday as software companies performed strongly and interest rates declined. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished the day up 623 points. Gold also surged in August amid growing concerns about U.S. debt, a weaker dollar and changing expectations surrounding potential Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. And a new survey suggests many Americans are unclear about Labor Day and its history. A Talker Research poll of 2,000 Americans found 66% correctly identified Sept. 7 as the date of Labor Day this year. The survey also found 61% correctly identified the meaning of the holiday: recognizing the contributions and achievements of American workers.

Major Automakers Push Congress for U.S. Ban on Chinese <b>Cars</b> by End of 2026

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents industry giants such as General Motors, Ford, Toyota Volkswagen, Hyundai, Honda, Stellantis, and other automakers, is as of Thursday openly calling for Congress to pass legislation permanently barring Chinese automakers from being able to sell cars in the United States, and urging for such action to take place before the end of the year. The push to limit the impact of Chinese automakers is nothing new. Back in July, legislation was proposed by the Senate Commerce Committee aimed at toughening the existing U.S. government restrictions on Chinese automakers, though it has yet to win final passage. Lawmakers such as Senators Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Bernie Moreno (R-OH) were behind that proposal (which had support from The Alliance for Automotive Innovation), specifically seeking to codify regulations set under the Biden administration that essentially ban Chinese automakers from selling or producing passenger vehicles and light-duty vehicles for the United States market. That’s not to say there haven’t been some hurdles involved in the existing fight. Senate Commerce Committee chair Ted Cruz has highlighted that a provision in the bill that would ban companies with more than 15% ownership by Chinese entities would bar the likes of Mercedes-Benz; Cruz pointed to that issue as an example of why he believes some changes will need to be made before anything is signed into law. Polestar has already been forced to withdraw from the United States for MY2027, owing to its majority ownership being China's Geely Holding. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation CEO John Bozzella told Reuters that any successful piece of legislation would send a “clear and bipartisan message” that China’s plans to rapidly grow its global automotive footprint will be treated as a national security issue here in the States. “Right now, Chinese automakers are dumping

'Unfair Trade': Automakers Push Congress To Ban Chinese <b>Cars</b> In The U.S.

‘Unfair Trade’: Automakers Push Congress To Ban Chinese Cars In The U.S. A major auto industry lobby group wants Congress to put an end to Chinese imports before they even start. - Car makers in the U.S. want Congress to ban Chinese cars before the end of the year. - There’s not a single Chinese-branded car for sale in the U.S, but a major lobby group wants that to become permanent law. - The Alliance for Automotive Innovation sent a letter to Congress, saying that Chinese automakers are dumping subsidized vehicles around the world. Chinese-branded cars are gaining steam across the world, except for the United States, where there’s not a single Chinese car for sale. And now, a major lobby group wants legislators to keep China’s connected cars out of the U.S. for good, as soon as possible. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents dozens of carmakers with a U.S. presence, including General Motors, Ford, Honda, BMW, Toyota, and Volvo, sent a letter to Congress, urging lawmakers to permanently ban Chinese cars from reaching the country before the year ends. BYD, China's biggest carmaker, has seen increased success in Europe with its growing portfolio of EVs and PHEVs. “Right now, Chinese automakers are dumping subsidized vehicles with connected software and hardware around the world,” said John Bozzella, the group’s CEO and the person who signed the letter. “China is capturing market share in Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia, Mexico, and South America with vehicles capable of collecting, processing, and transmitting sensitive vehicle and consumer data to the Chinese Communist Party.” To be clear, Chinese-made vehicles already face a couple of roadblocks, preventing them from hitting American roads. A 100% import tariff hikes prices even before they hit U.S. shores, and existing Commerce Department rules restrict Chinese software and hardware

Citroen C5 Aircross vs Toyota Fortuner (2026)

Citroen C5 Aircross vs Toyota Fortuner C5 Aircross Shine Diesel Fortuner GR-S 2.8 Diesel 4x4 AT Engine & Transmission Engine Type Engine Displacement Number of Cylinders Engine Installation Fuel Type/ Propulsion Pure Electric Driving Mode Gearbox Type Number of Gears Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox Drive Layout Lockable Differential/s Max Engine Power Max Engine Torque Fuel & Performance Fuel Supply System Emission Standard Auto Start/Stop Official Fuel Economy City Fuel Economy as Tested Highway Fuel Economy as Tested Fuel Tank Capacity 0-100kph 20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) 40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) Drive Mode Types Terrain Modes User Reported Mileage Suspension & Steering Front Suspension Type Front Springs Rear Suspension Type Rear Springs Damper Control Ride Height Adjust Type of Power Assist Steering Adjust type Steering Adjust 4 Wheel Steer Turning Radius Front Brakes Rear Brakes Wheel Size Front Tyre Size Rear Tyre Size Wheels Spare Wheel Dimensions Length Width Height Wheelbase Chassis Type Boot Capacity Doors Comfort Power Windows 12 Volt Port Powered Tailgate Cup Holders Cabin Boot Access Power Windows with One Touch-Down Digital Instrument Cluster Bluetooth Connectivity Door Pockets Vanity Mirror Driver Armrest Storage Electric Tailgate Release Rear Reading Lamp Steering Mounted Controls Front Seatback Pockets Interior Lamps Glove Box Headlight and Ignition on Reminder Power Windows with One Touch-Up Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold Remote Locking Keyless Entry Push Button Start Climate Control Rear AC Vents Third Row AC Vents Front Passenger Seat Adjust from Rear Rear Window Sun Shades Rear Windscreen Sun Shade Rear Power Outlet Sunroof Ambient Lighting Driving Modes Cruise Control Auto Parking Launch Control Dead Pedal Hands-free Boot Opening Cooled Glovebox Cooled Cup Holders Cooled Storage Heated ORVM Rear Parcel Tray Bottle Holder in Doors Flat

Detroit Wants China Locked Out — For Good | The Truth About <b>Cars</b>

Detroit Wants China Locked Out — For Good The lobbying arm of nearly every major automaker selling cars in America is asking Congress to slam the door on Chinese vehicles and keep it slammed. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation published an open letter this week calling for "a permanent ban on the sale, import and manufacture of Chinese connected vehicles, hardware and software." The Alliance is a Washington D.C.-based group whose membership reads like a roll call of the entire industry: General Motors, Ford, Stellantis, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, and Volkswagen, among others. Beyond the OEMs, it also represents suppliers, battery makers, semiconductor firms, technology companies, and autonomous-vehicle developers. The letter is addressed to House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Minority Leader Hakim Jeffries, and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer — a deliberately bipartisan spread of recipients for what the group insists is a bipartisan problem. This is not the group's first swing, notes the GM Authority. It has previously pushed for a ban on Chinese-made vehicles, hardware, and software in the U.S. This time it wants the prohibition made permanent. The Alliance frames China's expansion in the global auto industry as a threat to both national security and the U.S. economy. Its core complaint, per the letter: Chinese automakers benefit from a state-backed industrial system built on heavy subsidies and unfair trade practices, meaning American companies are competing against Beijing's industrial policy rather than individual rivals. The letter cites growing Chinese market share in Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia, Mexico, and South America as evidence of what's coming. Then there's the data angle. Chinese connected vehicles, according to the Alliance, are "capable of collecting, processing and transmitting sensitive vehicle and consumer data to the Chinese Communist Party." “This hasn’t happened inside the U.S. yet, but given

Huntersville police release photos of <b>car connected</b> to alleged drive by shooting

Huntersville police release photos of car connected to alleged drive by shooting Crime Stoppers is now offering a cash reward of $1K for information CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WBTV) - Huntersville police have new details in the case of an alleged drive-by shooting into a home on Aug. 19 on Seafield Lane in the MacCaulay community. “During the ongoing investigation, the Huntersville Police Department was able to obtain images of the vehicle connected to an alleged shooting into an occupied residence on Aug. 19. From the attached photos, it appears the vehicle is a second-generation Jeep Compass Latitude (2017-2021),” said a statement from the department. North Mecklenburg Crime Stoppers is now offering a cash reward of $1,000 for information leading to the identity or arrest of anyone involved in this case. On Aug. 19, just before midnight, officers responded to a call for shots fired on Seafield Lane. Police say, people from inside this car were seen shooting into a home before driving away. No one was hurt, but the home’s front door and windows were damaged. Neighbors who spoke to WBTV say they are shocked this happened in their usually quiet community. “It’s unreal. Unbelievable really that it happened in this neighborhood,” said Garry Worley. “Whoever did it maybe they were targeting another house of had something going on with someone in the neighborhood or another neighborhood and had the wrong residence. That’s our theory, but you never know.” Copyright 2026 WBTV. All rights reserved.

Europe Battery Management System Market Size, Share, 2034

- Product Description Description - Table of Contents TOC - List of Table & Figure LOT - Get Free Sample PDF Sample PDF Market Size, 2025 $3.01 Bn Market Estimate, 2026 $3.81 Bn Market Forecast, 2034 $24.98 Bn CAGR, 2026–2034 26.5% Europe Battery Management System Market Size The Europe battery management system market size was valued at USD 3.01 billion in 2025 and is estimated to reach USD 24.98 billion by 2034 from USD 3.81 billion in 2026, growing at a CAGR of 26.5%. A Battery Management System (BMS) is an electronic control unit that protects, monitors, and optimises rechargeable batteries. Its core jobs include monitoring cell health, preventing safety hazards, and balancing energy. These systems ensure optimal performance by regulating voltage, temperature and current while preventing hazardous conditions such as thermal runaway or overcharging. The market is intrinsically linked to the rapid electrification of transport and the expansion of stationary energy storage infrastructure. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, battery electric vehicles achieved a 14.6% market share of new car registrations in the European Union in 2023, reflecting an expanding infrastructure transition away from traditional internal combustion engines. As per the European Commission, implementing sustainable battery frameworks and lifecycle standards is vital for deploying clean technologies that advance the climate neutrality objectives outlined in the European Green Deal. With the implementation of the new EU Battery Regulation, manufacturers must adhere to strict sustainability and safety standards, which drive the demand for advanced diagnostic and tracking capabilities embedded within battery management systems. The integration of artificial intelligence allows for predictive maintenance and state of health estimation, extending battery lifespan and reducing waste. This technological evolution transforms battery management systems from passive monitoring devices into active intelligence hubs that optimise energy usage and enhance grid stability. The growing complexity of

Top automakers urge US Congress to permanently ban Chinese <b>cars</b>

Top automakers urge US Congress to permanently ban Chinese cars Companies such as BYD and Geely are quickly gaining market share around the world A COALITION of major automakers urged US lawmakers to permanently ban Chinese vehicles, citing the threats they pose to domestic economic and national security interests. In a letter to Democratic and Republican leadership of both the House of Representatives and Senate, the head of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation said lawmakers should ban Chinese connected cars as well as related vehicle software and hardware from the US before the current legislative session ends in January. “Right now, Chinese automakers are dumping subsidised vehicles with connected software and hardware around the world,” John Bozzella, the group’s chief executive officer, said in the letter, which was seen by Bloomberg News. “This hasn’t happened inside the US yet, but given the scale and urgency of this threat, we urge you to enact a Chinese vehicle, software and hardware ban before adjourning this year.” The call by the US auto industry’s biggest trade association — echoing a similar plea made by the alliance and other auto groups in March — underscores mounting concerns in the domestic industry about the threat posed by China’s automobile makers. The alliance represents domestic carmakers including General Motors as well as overseas giants Toyota Motor and Volkswagen. Companies such as BYD and Geely are rapidly gaining market share around the world, churning out exports as they contend with sluggish demand and cutthroat pricing in their domestic market. Cheap, tech-laden Chinese EVs are also appearing in both Canada and Mexico, amplifying concerns among US auto executives that they could soon seek inroads in America. Currently, Chinese vehicles are effectively shut out of the US market by steep tariffs and a Commerce Department ban on so-called connected

Tesla Cybercab Debut—Behind Closed Doors

Tesla staged its long-promised Cybercab launch event in Austin, Texas, on Thursday evening, formally introducing the two-seat, steering-wheel-free robotaxi into the company’s commercial ride-hailing fleet. Yet for a company that has turned product reveals into spectacle, from the Cybertruck’s shattered window to the original Cybercab unveiling on a Hollywood soundstage in 2024, this event was notable for what it withheld. Despite weeks of teasers from Chief Executive Elon Musk and other Tesla executives, the presentation was not livestreamed, and as of Thursday evening Tesla had posted no live footage and offered no public remarks from Musk or other company leaders. The absence of a broadcast caught much of Tesla’s own online fan base off guard. Posts circulated in the minutes before the event asking where the stream had gone, with one attendee-adjacent account calling it a “PR disaster.” Invited guests, many of them social media influencers who regularly post supportive content about Musk’s companies, had been asked to sign non-disclosure agreements and hold their posts until the event concluded, leaving outside observers to track the moment largely through Tesla’s public robotaxi vehicle tracker rather than any stage presentation. From Concept Car to Commercial Fleet The Cybercab has been nearly two years in the making since Musk first unveiled the concept at Warner Bros. Studios in October 2024, promising a low-cost, purpose-built robotaxi that would anchor Tesla’s autonomous ambitions. The production version held to that original vision: a two-seat cabin, butterfly doors, and a complete absence of a steering wheel, accelerator, or brake pedal, with the vehicle relying entirely on Tesla’s Full Self-Driving software and its AI4 computer for every mile. Production began at Gigafactory Texas earlier this year, and Tesla has spent recent months testing Cybercabs on public roads in multiple cities, occasionally with safety monitors aboard. Ahead of Thursday’s